Subscribe to my free email notifications for new articles:

August 29, 2021

An Example of Courageous Pushback for Those Facing Vaccine Mandates in the Workplace

This letter/legal notification was sent by Police Constable Adrienne Gilvesy (a member of the Toronto Police Service) to her Chief of Police in response to mandatory vaccination and mandatory COVID testing requirements. 

I am posting it here with her permission and for your benefit. Never flinch. Be informed about the law. And call an employment lawyer. 

Adrienne, thank you for allowing me to make your letter public! I hope your courage inspires many others to take a stand for their rights. Creating an unstoppable flood begins with a single drop.

Update: The good folks at Police On Guard For Thee have posted a generic template of Adrienne's letter that you can download and modify for your employer. As always, it is not a replacement for legal advice from your employment lawyer.

~ ~ ~

(This is not intended as legal advice. Provided for informational purposes only.)

~ ~ ~

Saturday, August 28th, 2021

 

To: Chief of Police James Ramer 
       Toronto Police Service
       40 College Street
       Toronto, ON
       ████████@torontopolice.on.ca

      and

To whom it may concern,

I am writing in relation to the recent eUpdate “Mandatory Vaccination Requirement for TPS Members” sent to all members via email on Tuesday August 24th, 2021.

I am not going to disclose my vaccination status to the Toronto Police Service as my medical health is protected by privacy laws. My medical health and choices are private and confidential and I am not required to disclose these to anyone. The Toronto Police Service does not have the right to ask me about my vaccination status. My privacy is protected under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, 2000 (PIPEDA) as well as the Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 (PHIPA) as well as the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1 and the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, RSO 1990. The same privacy laws apply to all members.

I am not going to consent to any type of COVID-19 testing that the Toronto Police Service may mandate. I do not give my informed consent.

Informed consent means that the person who will administer the medical treatment or procedure, needs to inform you of all the benefits and risks associated with the medical treatment or procedures as well as alternative treatments before you decide if you will consent or not. This is medical freedom. These are our God-given inalienable rights.

Elements of consent: your expressed, informed and explicit consent (voluntary) must be obtained prior to treatment. Without consent it is considered assault under the Criminal Code of Canada. Consent given under fear or duress is not consent. Section 265(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada defines consent in relation to assault as:

Consent

(3) For the purposes of this section, no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist by reason of

·         (a) the application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant;

·         (b) threats or fear of the application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant;

·         (c) fraud; or

·         (d) the exercise of authority.

 

The Ontario Health Care Consent Act, 1996 defines “consent” as well :

Consent to Treatment

No treatment without consent

10 (1) A health practitioner who proposes a treatment for a person shall not administer the treatment, and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it is not administered, unless,

(a)  he or she is of the opinion that the person is capable with respect to the treatment, and the person has given consent; or

(b)  he or she is of the opinion that the person is incapable with respect to the treatment, and the person’s substitute decision-maker has given consent on the person’s behalf in accordance with this Act.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 10 (1).

Elements of consent

11 (1) The following are the elements required for consent to treatment:

1.  The consent must relate to the treatment.

2.  The consent must be informed.

3.  The consent must be given voluntarily.

4.  The consent must not be obtained through misrepresentation or fraud.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 11 (1).

Treatment is defined in the Ontario Health Care Consent Act, 1996 as follows:

“means anything that is done for a therapeutic, preventive, palliative, diagnostic, cosmetic or other health-related purpose, and includes a course of treatment, plan of treatment or community treatment plan”. This definition would include any vaccination or any COVID-19 test, as they are both, allegedly, “preventive”, “diagnostic” and for a “health-related purpose”.

The Nuremberg Code, to which Canada is a signatory, states that it is essential before performing a medical procedure on human beings, that there is voluntary informed consent. It also confirms a person involved should have legal capacity to give consent, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him/her to make an informed decision.

Nuremberg Code: Article 6, Section 1:

Any preventative, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be expressed and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

Nuremberg Code: Article 6: Section 3:

In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.

By forcing members to submit to a COVID-19 vaccination or test (including the rapid antigen test), you will also be in breach of the Nuremberg Code.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Canada has well established case law that deals with medical treatment without the informed consent of the patient. Case law, to some in the legal field, would be regarded as the most recent, gold-standard-type of law. As you know, being the Chief of Police for the biggest police service in Canada, case law cannot be overturned or overruled without new case law on that issue. We, as police officers, have a duty to be up to date and knowledgeable on recent case law. The Supreme Court of Canada has made it clear that it is unconstitutional to force medical treatment of any kind without the informed consent of the patient. Any action taken by police in contravention of case law, would be unlawful. Furthermore, ignorance of case law could be considered willful blindness or neglect of duty, to name a few. 

In terms of accessing my health records, the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act also speaks to this. Under the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1 under Section 63(2) it states:

Information confidential

Employer access to health records

(2) No employer shall seek to gain access, except by an order of the court or other tribunal or in order to comply with another statute, to a health record concerning a worker without the worker’s written consent.  R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1, s. 63 (2).

Also under the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c O.1 it outlines penalties:

PART IX
OFFENCES AND PENALTIES

Penalties

66 (1) Every person who contravenes or fails to comply with,

(a) a provision of this Act or the regulations;

(b) an order or requirement of an inspector or a Director; or

(c) an order of the Minister,

is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than twelve months, or to both.  R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1, s. 66 (1); 2017, c. 34, Sched. 30, s. 4 (1).

While I recognize that Section 63(2) of the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1990, states that accessing the health records of an employee is subject to any other statue (which presumably includes the Reopening Ontario {A Flexible Response to Covid-19} Act, 2020), it is nonetheless important to highlight this Act, for a several reasons. We have, after all, been relying partly on this Act to govern our internal Toronto Police routine orders and mandates surrounding COVID-19. Laws surrounding mask exemptions for employees, for example, found within the Reopening Ontario Act, is one example where the Toronto Police Service has relied on (legally or not) the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act over the Reopening Ontario Act.  Furthermore, “any other statue” is a very broad legal inclusion and would include many of the laws I have referenced in this letter.

Furthermore, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 2 (a) (freedom of conscience and religion) and Section 7 (everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice), apply to these mandates. Human bodily autonomy is as basic as it gets in terms of rights. I have the right to liberty – and this includes my right to refuse medical treatment (including vaccines or any of the available or future tests for COVID-19).

The PCR test is a form of genetic test and also would fall under the definition of a medical procedure. The following legislation also applies: Bill S-201, Statues of Canada 2017: “An Act to prohibit and prevent genetic discrimination”. In it, it clearly defines “genetic test”: genetic test means a test that analyzes DNA, RNA or chromosomes for purposes such as the prediction of disease or vertical transmission risks, or monitoring, diagnosis or prognosis. (test génétique)


Furthermore, in this legislation it also outlines Prohibitions:

Prohibitions

Genetic test

3 (1) It is prohibited for any person to require an individual to undergo a genetic test as a condition of

(a) providing goods or services to that individual;

(b) entering into or continuing a contract or agreement with that individual; or

(c) offering or continuing specific terms or conditions in a contract or agreement with that individual.


This legislation also outlines “Offences and Punishment”

Contravention of sections 3 to 5

7 Every person who contravenes any of sections 3 to 5 is guilty of an offence and is liable

(a) on conviction on indictment, to a fine not exceeding $1,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or to both; or

(b) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding $300,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding twelve months, or to both.


Lastly, as indicated by Ontario Public Health numerous times (and as evidenced in our ICU statistics), vaccinated persons can still get and transmit COVID-19 despite their inoculation. With this “scientific” evidence, if you target only the non-disclosed, unvaccinated or accommodated persons under the Human Rights Code to COVID-19 testing, this is grounds for discrimination.

The testing, hypothetically, is to ensure that you don’t transmit COVID-19 to other co-workers or the citizens of Toronto that you interact with on a regular basis. If you do in fact outwardly target unvaccinated, accommodated or non-disclosed employees only, this is grounds for discrimination and harassment and is liable for legal action as well. In addition, by discriminating against non-disclosed, unvaccinated or accommodated employees, the Toronto Police Service will be breaking its own Procedure. Contained within the Toronto Police Service’s Procedure 08-12 titled “Workplace Harassment” it states in the first line: “The Toronto Police Services Board (Board) and the Toronto Police Service (Service) are committed to providing a workplace that is free of discrimination and harassment to all its members”.

I would also like to bring the Service’s attention to an eUpdate that was sent via email to all Toronto Police Service employees on February 10th, 2021. Contained within the contents of the eUpdate was the following paragraph: “As all medical decisions, you will have the right to choose. Below are some links to get you started and help you make an informed decision”.  I have retained a copy of this eUpdate, if required, for reference. In February of 2021, the Toronto Police Service recognized that informed consent was required for any medical procedure, yet in August of 2021 their message has changed. What laws have changed between the months of February 2021 and August of 2021 that would overrule this fact?

It is evident that the Toronto Police Service is in breach of various federal and provincial legislations, as well as case law and their own internal procedures with the recent COVID-19 vaccine disclose requirement, vaccination and possible testing mandates.

In conclusion, I hereby notify you that I will hold you personally liable for any financial injury and/or loss of my personal income and my ability to provide food and shelter for my family if you use coercion or discrimination against me based on my decision to not participate in Toronto Police Service’s COVID-19 vaccination and testing mandates nor will I disclose my vaccination status to you.

Name:                           ____DC Adrienne GILVESY_______ 

Signature:                      ___████████████████____


~ ~ ~





70 comments:

  1. Thanks for sharing. I'm curious if this was successful in getting the police dept to back down? I'm in BC and we are now facing restrictions for those who have chosen to refuse the jab. I'm trying to find out if this is even legal for the BC government to implement. Even if I had been vaxed I would not want businesses knowing that information. Surely its covered under right to privacy laws? I'm so angry and upset that the BC government, along with SO MANY people, thinks its perfectly okay to bully citizens into compliance.
    If you happen to know of any organization that I can contact I'd appreciate it.
    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Time will tell. She has thrown down the gauntlet. If enough people follow in her footsteps, the threat of being buried by endless litigation will force institutions and businesses to start pushing back against the government.

      We have reached an inflection point.

      There are at least four constitutional rights organizations, which are likely mounting class action suits as we speak:
      https://www.constitutionalrightscentre.ca/
      https://www.jccf.ca/

      And I strongly encourage you to reach out to an employment lawyer. Some work on a “no-win, no-fee arrangement”.

      Delete
    2. Any list of "no-win, no-fee arrangement" employment lawyer ?

      Delete
    3. You would want to go to an Employment Lawyer only if they also practice Constitutional Law. As one Employment Lawyer told me, they can mandate immunizations only if the Government passed legislation.
      I told them, they cannot do such a thing, because its a constitutional violation. We have a constitution to prevent such a thing.

      Delete
    4. We as a whole can fight back as shown by this letter. We have the PPC the only party that actually cares about us and are fighting to turn this boat around.

      Delete
    5. A friend of mine was told (threatened) that if he did not get fully vaccinated, he wouldn't lose his job. But he won't get any hours! I'm self employed and am yet to see how bc's new restrictions will impact me. I see some answers above. I believe we are given permission to use parts of this letter?

      Delete
    6. The PPC Party is just as bad as The Existing Government. The Leader of the PPC Party is Justin Trudeau's Best Friend. Don't be fooled. Justin Trudeau Help Max become the Leader of PPC to Split The Vote between the Right.

      Delete
    7. Toronto Police have publicly stated now, that they will not be forcing their staff to vaccinate. So it seems to have worked.

      Delete
    8. Hey Trevor, I've looked for evidence that the Police have dropped their mandate, but can't find ay. Can you point out a link I could look at?

      Delete
    9. What I am really ashamed of is Canada had 2 years to get these people in power https://therealistpartyofcanada.ca/ ..none of this would have happened if they were..any other parry is sub sub standard

      Delete
  2. The same question as above: was it successful? In Ontario Ford just allowed to health officer to introduce any policies restricting people who refuse to show their vaccination status, including firing them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Except that is still illegal. The employer would lose in court. What the government has done, is passed liability onto the employer. This is explained on the Canadian Constitutional Rights Centre website. The law is clear. If it went to court the employer would lose. There is no question about the violations of law. So. You take it to court. Most would back down. The government has really thrown employers and businesses under the bus again. Pretty nasty of them.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. I want to point out that so far the courts sided with any pro-lockdown/pro-vaccine-for-all/pro-masking arguments even when the government(s) can't demonstrate ANY scientific information confirming their decisions or like in case of CDC shameless manipulating the statistics, i.e. they stated that vaccines save for children by lumping data for all people under 30, while the argument for heart inflammation was related only to boys 16 or younger or i.e.2 when CDC stated that majority of infections is among of unvaccinated, while they lumped up the data from January 1st, when they were almost not vaccinated people

      Delete
    4. This might be of interest to you and others as well.
      https://rumble.com/vkorz0-freedom-fighter-court-victory-ends-masking-shots-quarantine-in-alberta.html?fbclid=IwAR1U_BTSRJrXLCIFw0dGHfHT3in7Dy36vANIQrm-G7f85Zn97hXrMRVKuT4

      Delete
    5. I fully agree with Dmitry E. This is a total manipulation. Its a scientific fact lockdowns, covid vaccine mandates and masking is unconstitutional & unscientific. Has been proven by 10's of 1000s of doctors & medical professionals. Backed by many peer reviewed scientific medical studies. This sounds like they will do anything for a National Vaccine Passport, that WILL cause Discrimination & civil unrest for the populace.

      People need to wake up & put a stop to this nonsense.

      Delete
    6. Ford is in Violation of the Nuremberg code and the constitution of Canada. He will face the Death Penalty as per the Nuremberg Code.

      Delete
    7. All "leaders" around the world supporting the mass psychosis will swing at the gallows.

      Delete
  3. I like what she said about the PCR test my son, was asked to sit outside in the cold in February as he was targetted and discriminated and forced to take TWO PCR tests, and he was also going to be forced to do another THIRD one, and based on this my son should sue those people! He was forced to stay at home without pay for 18 days. We did not have the funds for a lawyer and all this covid the way it played out, was against our human rights, but under this 'health guise' most of employees especially young interns really were not aware of what steps to take.. This officer is amazing for standing up...! i really wish i had the funds to sue those two women that put my son through hell and back, and forced him to stay outside in the cold, because they though he had a 'virus'!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Contact the Canadian Justice Centre for Constitutional Rights. They can help,you or put you in touch with someone who can. We have about 4 Constitutional Rights Centres that sue the government, often in class action . Often they can give you letters of liability like this one the police officer shared.

      Delete
    2. @Martine, Rocco Galati has launched class action lawsuit for federal employees: https://policeonguard.ca/rocco-galati-along-with-police-on-guard-launch-federal-lawsuit-against-mandatory-vaccination-vaccine-passports/

      Also, look into what the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms can do for you: https://www.jccf.ca/

      And get in touch with an employment lawyer. Some employment lawyers will offer a “contingency fee arrangement”, also called a “no-win, no-fee arrangement”, which means that you’ll only have to pay their fees if you win or reach a settlement.

      Delete
    3. I suspect anyone who gets tested will have their DNA in some global database.

      Delete
    4. Every single province and territory has a Human Rights Commission and Tribunal. Filing a claim for a human rights violation is often initiated by filling out a form - something that one does not need a lawyer for.
      Canadians need to better understand their rights and the tools they have available to them to ensure their rights are not violated!!!!
      When people willingly comply with mandates they are giving away their rights!!!! This has to stop! Educate yourself and use tools like this letter to fight back. Time is of essence - we are in dire straits.

      Delete
    5. MartineGiambertone - you need to sue these two people as an individual (not the place they worked for). This has to be a personal lawsuit against that person (not the place they work at) - this will put shivers into all of these criminals, and will think twice because they will be afraid. You can also go to the court and put a lien on their property is what I heard. I do not know the process, but you can take their names and put a lien on their properties.

      Delete
  4. It is time to clearly acknowledge that these measures are modeled on 1930s Germany. Jews then, unvaccinated now.
    Oh, and by the way, it is a bioweapon, not a "vaccine."
    You may not care about yourself, but for GOD'S SAKE, consider the children.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You make very good points. Which brings me to the following question: does anyone have a lawyer letter to give to my spouse if he gets too pushy about 💉💉 my 8yo? Sadly, the time may come when she might become eligible…

      Delete
    2. If they cared about the children they'd stop abortion hypocrisy

      Delete
    3. You can get a copy of that letter from Rocco Galati's website.

      Delete
    4. Truly amazing that so many people are failing to make the connection between this & other scapegoating events in history, when govts got away with misusing their 'power' with disastrous results.. (In the case of democratic govt. systems like Canada, elected members of parliament are considered 'public servants' - but here too our schools FAIL to teach us properly about our citizens' rights, & fails to inform immigrants of the same)

      Delete
    5. Oops i meant 'fail to inform immigrants..' (eg. new residents from non-democratic places - no disrespect meant to them, of course) PS. & THANK YOU for this marvelous post - DC Adrienne GILVESY is truly a public servant of whom we can be PROUD~! XO

      Delete
  5. It's rich that the same police who were zealously enforcing Covid laws are now bucking against this enforcement. Hypocrisy much?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree @Mariflower. Those were goons hired by Tory

      Delete
  6. ..Canada is not the nation I know from my years at UoT in the '60s...

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is wonderfully written. Thank you! Keep standing your ground warriors.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you for another great article, I will be sharing. This too is worth watching and sharing. YT will probably censor it so make haste. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUE5EBPt-lU&t=1671s

    ReplyDelete
  9. When DC Gilvesy comes into the room, I'll stand up and salute!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Very well done. Make no mistake, this is war. War of psychological and biological. We did not throw.pens and needles at the communists we fought in the wars. We did not lick the shoes of communists as our pm does, we did not give our Canadian monies to commies, and provide no drinking water to ALL Canadians.

    Discriminating and dividing Canadians. Lying, equals censorship, fraud, negligence, ignorance.

    Fellow Canadians, if you believe that this will stop with the 3rd, 4th, 5th booster shot, think again

    This is war

    Retired Military, Manitoba

    Stand Our ground

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hear you, loud and clear. It's time to stand to, advance to contact, sir.

      Delete
  11. You are a hero! Thank you for this!

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is great! But it seems that the governments justify these unlawful actions with the Emergencies Act? Does this act trump the law? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, the charter trumps all, even emergency orders. They would have to suspend the charter and even then would be met with major resistance.

      Delete
    2. Emergency act is over in canada

      Delete
    3. It's totally against the Charter. It's against the Nuremberg Code Period. All people who support Such actions as forcing these Criminal Acts on people will face the Death Penalty, as The Nuremberg Code doesn't except areas that don't have the Death Penalty. It's automatically invoked regardless.

      Delete
  13. First of all thank you Julius for publishing the letter.
    Secondly thank you the police officer for writing the latter.

    Now the question: can somebody explain the vaccination push?
    Is it another blind and stupid copy-catting from the US, where COVID is a weapon against Republicans.
    Ot like one of the people wrote: divide and rule?

    Vaccines, especially mRNA vaccines, are not every efficient, not very safe and if they need a booster shot they will be even less safe and less efficient.
    When I started tracking data from Israel a month ago Pfizer efficacy was 18% in preventing hospitalizations and no effect whatsoever on preventing infections.
    Right now when 1/4 of population has the third shot(!) the vaccine efficacy runs around 48%. And it seems that vaccinated people are MORE likely to have an infection.

    So what is the point?
    Just achieve blind obedience?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am on the cusp of publishing a Deep Dive to explain the vaccination push - stay tuned...!

      Delete
    2. THank you, I hope you will post the link there for us all

      Delete
    3. I hope to see it when you do!

      Delete
    4. Here it is: The Snake-Oil Salesmen and the COVID-Zero Con: A Classic Bait-And-Switch for a Lifetime of Booster Shots (Immunity as a Service)

      https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html

      Delete
  14. Bravo! We need to take a stand against "Vaccine Passports" for all the same reasons noted above. Forcing "vaccines" without any disclosure of potential side effects, people are dying. Harassing and discriminating Canadian's by forcing them to be injected with an unknown, untested experimental agent and putting our health at risk by threatening to take our freedom's away is completely unacceptable. What our govt is doing is a complete violation of our human rights and freedoms. We need to stand up and fight against this madness, Trudeau is the ring leader of this corruption puppet show and must be forced out of office and into a prison cell..

    We collectively need to wake up and take action before Trudeau ruins our country in so many ways, including blowing billions of our tax dollars on vaccine propaganda advertising campaigns, bribing the media to censor and only report one pro-vaccine narrative, purchasing insane quantities of costly "vaccine" doses in hopes of forcing quarterly injections on all Canadians through 2025 !!

    This madness needs to stop, we need to take our country back from this totalitarian government before it's too late. The current "vaccines" do not "stop the spread", there is absolutely no scientific rationale for vaccine passports.

    STOP VACCINE PASSPORTS, STOP THE MADNESS!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.brighteon.com/1cef020d-0cf7-4ab6-a328-85f198e71e94

      Delete
    2. There will be no end to this madness!!!
      He is planning to administer booster shots every 6 months. This has nothing to do with your health and all to do with BIG Pharma profit and consequently to Gates's agenda to world depopulation.

      Delete
    3. Please if you are truly against this show up on September 18th at Queen's Park for the Rally to Stop this Nonsense. One of Several Rallies Worldwide.

      Delete
  15. Thank You for posting this and Thank You to PC Gilvesy for taking the time to put together such a well constructed, clear statement of her workplace boundaries. It is of interest to me how unions and federations, who are legally and morally obliged to represent employees in conflict with employers will rationalize the fundamental ethical double-bind of supporting vaccine mandates at the same time as having a responsibility to represent those dues paying members with legitimate harassment objections.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I too am facing mandatory vaccination or be fired. Where can I get a letter like this to send to my employer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://action4canada.com/wp-content/uploads/Notice-of-Liability-Employees-final-web-version-3.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjf6NHr_tzyAhXUpZ4KHXsYDAgQFnoECAMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3Bd7Kx5o21CinCu42cUADO

      Delete
  17. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Telegram%20Desktop/Notice-of-Liability-Employees-final-web-version-3.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  18. The above and below same post is the Official Letter alot of you are looking for. Copy link, paste, open and print 5 pages.

    file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Telegram%20Desktop/Notice-of-Liability-Employees-final-web-version-3.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It says the file can not be accessed. I copied the letter posted here and modified it to fit my employer and situation (I work as an employee under the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care - DOH!). But I also read that a letter is not legal until it has been commissioned. I'm wondering how much of a legal difference, if any, having a letter commissioned creates over just handing them this? Might anyone know?

      Delete
  19. How to fight vaccine mandates at elementary schools and sports? Taking our kids out? They want to go to school and play sports.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The 'provisional approval' in the United States was granted based on the 'fact' that there were no other treatments available. That is the only way that provisional approval can be given to an untested drug or vaccine. That is untrue. Everything since then has been based on that initial lie. There is growing evidence that Ivermectin is useful in both the prevention and treatment of COVID 19.
    Please review: On Driving SARS-CoV2 Extinct by Heather Heying and Bret Weinstein (July 30, 2021) and the Ontario Civil Liberties' A Letter to the Unvaccinated.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I desperately need a french version of this letter!! Teachers are next and I am so worried.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Have you looked into copying it and putting it into an online translator?

      Delete
  22. How to fight vaccine mandates at elementary schools and sports? Taking our kids out? They want to go to school and play sports. Our kids are our future, they have been through enough.. anyone have anything for this ?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Good for you and well done. Our freedoms and rights cannot be trampled so carelessly. We are proud Canadians with a history of standing up for each other and being proud of our nation and our freedoms. You are brave, courageous, and I will support you always.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anyone have a letter for the USA?
    Also what about the so called approved corminaty shot??
    Unfortunately at my job they have weekly testing soon, if unvaccinated. My union and other unions at this employer have been ignored when it was implemented!
    I don't have time to stop it, but I will see if I can challenge the testing at least if they create the mandate I have a track record of them violating my rights on a flawed PCR test that's being retired in December!

    ReplyDelete
  25. I used parts of this email, in my own letter to the Ontario college I teach at, but on Monday I was fired, for Cause. I sent it to 200+ faculty, the president and all the Deans, with my name on it. I got Fired for using their email system to criticize there policy. I used almost all of the laws listed in this original email and edited it for my own email.

    I stand by my decision to send it and would do it again.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe for free email notifications for new articles:

Search This Blog