COVID lockdowns pose the identical dilemma, only this time it's not a game and it's played with real lives. When humanity invented universal human rights, they were meant to stop us from pulling the switch.
February 7, 2021
(Video) Bystander at the Switch: The Moral Case Against COVID Lockdowns
January 25, 2021
Bystander at the Switch: The Moral Case Against COVID Lockdowns
In grade school the riddle was posed as a moral dilemma. But it's not. There was only ever one correct choice. We invented universal human rights to make it clear that no person or government has the right to pull the switch to send the train down another track towards a sacrificial group of victims.
January 22, 2021
Open letter to Dr. Theresa Tam (Chief Public Health Officer of Canada) regarding the public health response to COVID:
Dear Dr. Tam,
RE: Request for a two-way public discussion with you about the public health response to COVID.
Many people, both in Canada and worldwide, are critical of the public health response to COVID-19 (lockdowns, masks, PCR testing, treatment options, vaccine rollout, etc.). The Great Barrington Declaration alone counts more than 53,000 medical practitioners and medical scientists, as well as over 700,000 concerned citizens like myself who have tried to prompt a broader discussion about these measures. But for the past 10 months, our media, politicians, and health authorities have largely ignored our concerns or, worse yet, lectured and ridiculed us as conspiracy theorists or uncaring monsters who don't care about grandma.